23 December 2010

Solstice Sunset to Sunrise 200 km

I've been wanting to do an all night ride on the Solstice for about 15 years. I love being out in the weather, EXPERIENCING what's REAL, and the night of the Solstice has always seemed particularly special for that. It just seems to me a great way to celebrate the cycles of the seasons. And riding is so much fun and so interesting and such a good way to experience different places -- it has always felt like a really good fit to me.

Also, the pagan ritual, which i like, is to keep a light burning all night on the longest night of the year, to encourage the sun to come back. In ritual that that is really supposed to be a candle, which you have to stay up with, both for the ritual, and for fire safety. I certainly can never stay up with it alone... I once tried playing games with my then girlfriend all night on the Solstice, but she gave up several hours before dawn.

I REALLY like the idea of keeping my BIKE light on all night for the Solstice ritual! I have several lights on my bike. I have a small backup LED light, which i carried but did not use. But my main light is a halogen headlight and bright red LED tail light both run by a generator. I really like the idea of a human powered light being the light i keep burning all night - by keeping my wheels turning! Isn't THAT a cool idea?!?

I also have a string of Christmas lights on my bike, 45 to 50 multi-colored LEDs, (which i generally keep on my bike from my birthday until Valentines Day every year)... and those would be on even during breaks. I turned them on at sunset, which was about 45 minutes before i left home.


This was a ride that was set up by a club called the Seattle International Randonneurs (SIR). Randonneuring is a very strict style of competitive long distance cycling. It is absolutely self-sufficient -- no outside support of any kind is allowed. (Unlike so many rides where there is motor support or fully stocked rest stops.) While the people tend to be laid back, they are serious about competing against the clock, and often against each other. Many have a goal of entering Paris-Brest-Paris every three years in France, which is the pinnacle of the sport. It is 1,200 km (720 miles), one stage; time limit is 90 hours.

Randonneuring is very structured with lots of paperwork. Riders strive to complete a series of longer and longer rides (from 100km up to 1200km) over one year, and an important aspect is providing the proof of completion. Controls are the way that riders prove they completed the entire course, and within the time limit. You have to have your ride card signed at each control.

I like the attitude and the equipment that many randonneurs have. And i really like the self-supported aspect. However, i'm not at all interested in the competitive aspect. I prefer a more relaxed style; i ride to enjoy the ride, be with people, see the area, learn something, and experience things. To me, flexibility and cooperation during a ride are virtues, not problems. Nevertheless, since randonneurs ride very long distances, they are often the only people i can find to ride long distances with me.

Randonneurs do not have any official equipment, but the people tend towards a view of equipment which i like. It is centered around a efficient self-sufficiency; it is not flashy: back to basics. They ride more durable bikes than other recreational cyclists, more transportational, many ride hand built bikes and it's not uncommon to see lugged steel. They always use fenders (fenders are required by the rules in fact) use innovative, basic cargo bags and have developed some very effective elegant, simple and often attractive solutions.

There are several different types of rides that Randonneurs run. Most of them, the more formal ones, have a set date and time with control stations (including secret controls) staffed by club members who are not riding that day. However they maintain a large list of routes that you can complete at anytime you like called PERMANENTs. This allows riders to get practice and even complete some required distances. Usually on a Permanent most controls are food stores and you prove you visited a control by producing the receipt from your purchase with the time and date. The other riders with you sign your card.

This sunset to sunrise 200 km (126 mile) ride is a SIR Permanent. Actually, this exact route is two different official SIR Permanents with different start/finish points. One starts and ends at Leschi, just south of my house (Permanent 606) and the other (Permanent 390) starts and ends in Redmond on the other side of the lake.

I've always wanted to do a ride on the Solstice and i can never find anyone to do it with me, and i cannot do it alone. And this year i had the fitness to put in a lot of miles; So even though the Randonneurs are not quite my style of riding, i figured i'd join them on their ride in order to get my Solstice ride in.

The group riding yesterday was planning to ride Permanent 390, so the official start was in Redmond), almost exactly 50km (on the course) from my house. But i didn't want to ride the full ride, pass directly by my home, continue all the way to end in Redmond, just to have to figure out how to get home!! So decided i would start from my house, ride a couple of miles to join the route, and then finish at that point too, and it would just be 2 miles uphill and i'd be home. So i would actually be riding Permanent 606.

Since i am not a member of SIR and not an OFFICIAL Randonneur, i could not OFFICIALLY participate. Even though i knew the folks, and they were happy to have me along, i was officially a bandit. In fact, i had to ask permission just to make certain that the others were not disqualified for riding with an unofficial rider! (That's how strict many randonneuring rides can be!)

Anyway, since i was unofficial, it didn't matter at all where i started and stopped, but since the guy running the event was a friend, who respects my riding ability, i thought if i was careful to follow the other route (606) and all the controls, and if i completed it, he might give me a pin. But the pin wasn't important to me. Riding all night on the solstice was what was important to me.

My riding fitness is very good these days (i'd ridden 4,000 miles in the first 11 months of 2010) but, still, it took a couple of days to psych myself up to actually do the ride. Partially because of the distance, and the overnight, (even though those are things i like, i was nervous) but mostly because of the rando riders... i didn't know them and i wasn't sure i could ride with them. I was pretty sure i couldn't keep up. Joe told me, via email, that they were planning to do a twelve, to twelve and half hour 200 km ride. I've done a 13 hour 200 km, so i felt i could do that. My pace is about 14 mph, and that's a 12-13 hour 200 km with stops. It seemed to work out on paper. And while rando rides are NOT stay together rides, Joe's email also said this was pretty much a 'no drop' ride. I told him i thought i'd be the slowest out there, but he assured me it would be fine. I was hoping there would be a few people who i knew, and maybe some who were more into camaraderie than competition.

Still i was nervous. As often happens, i didn't actually start to be serious about the ride until i started telling people about it.

I was also a bit worried about my equipment. Usually that's not a worry -- i keep my equipment tip top. But i lost my good pair of winter riding gloves recently so i've been trying out new gloves for a few weeks. I had been having problems with my front brake and my generator has been failing in the rain for some strange reason. So i spent some time in the afternoon working on my bike and collecting gear. I figured if the equipment worked on the 30 miles to the 'start' i'd be ok

I talked to my friend Nadine. She encouraged me to go. The course loops right around her house out in the country and she said i could stop in, and sleep if i wanted, she would only have one of her grandkids at the house that night and would have a convenient spare room.. She even said she would come out and pick me up if i needed it. That was a very nice fall back plan.

I tried to talk a few friends into going along, and especially someone who would start in Seattle and ride that first 30 mi with me, but i couldn't find anyone. So i would ride that first, very familiar, section alone to get to the 'start' of the ride.

As it approached sunset, i was kind of excited. I had been all day. Nervous too. I liked having the motivation to undertake the challenge, wasn't entirely sure i could complete it, but was confident that somehow, it would be ok.

The sun set at 4:26pm, and i set out at 5:07. It was threatening rain, in fact, about 2 blocks from home i got some raindrops, but the rain didn't continue. I rode a slightly different route off Capitol Hill than i would usually ride so i could join the course at E Galer St & 26th Ave E.

Once on the course, i rode the rest of the way off Capitol Hill, and at the University i got on the Burke-Gillman Trail going north -- this is a 30 mile long bike trail through wealthy housing areas right along the lake shore and i have ridden all or part of it hundreds of times, i know it very well. It's also kind of a famous bike trail, one of the first rail to trail conversions in the US (in the mid-1970s). It was recently written up by the BBC! And it is also one of the most popular: in the summer it is very, very crowded.

There were a few bike commuters in the first few miles, but mostly i had the trail to myself. It's 15 miles to the top of the lake and i was really moving. I was amazed at how fast i was going. I was focusing on riding in my biggest gear, working at maximum efficiency, saving energy, as i usually do when setting out on a very long ride, but still... i was flying. It felt good. I was actually worried that i might get to the coffee shop that was the 'start' point, too early! My light, or rather the generator, was working very well; i was pleased that the repair i had made to it that morning was successful.

After i crossed the head of the valley, still on that trail, i turned south and BAM!! i got hit with a very, very strong head wind. I had 10 miles to go to the start and this wind was quite demoralizing. I was wondering if the weather forecast had changed again and there was a storm of some sort coming in. I even stopped briefly to call a friend who checked the weather radar online for me. (It looked OK.) So i fought the head wind from the town of Woodinville, down to Redmond, still riding pretty strong, but it was a struggle.

I made a wrong turn on a newly built trail junction even though i've been there dozens of times. I made that same wrong turn the last time i rode this trail; it's poorly marked. That added a half a mile or so. But i got to the 'start' in plenty of time, at 7:40pm. Now i was out in the really ugly suburban sprawl. Big 7 lane streets, no sidewalks, strip malls and parking lots as far as the eye can see. Urban design based on Los Angeles. Yuck!

At this point, 50 km (30 mi), into any ride i would need to eat, not just a granola bar, but a meal. And especially since i was planning on riding on for hours and hours, i needed to make sure i had a significant meal. The randonneurs were planning major food stops every 50 to 70 km, but they were just starting out, i was 50 km in, so effectively i was still on my own.

When i rolled into the parking lot where the coffee shop was i saw Matt, who i know through Kent, taking his bike out of his car. Matt lives near me, just one block off the course, i was surprised he drove to the start. He said, "Wow! I didn't expect to see YOU here!

I went inside where cyclists were gathering, more than i expected: there were about 18 in the end. They seemed quite intimidating. At first i didn't know anyone. Also, i'm used to being quite a bit older than everyone, in most situations i'm in, but everyone on this ride was older than me. Weird.

I had already ridden 50 km, they were all fresh. I was quite hungry and really wanted a soup or stew or something -- and probably should have crossed the parking lot and fed myself, but i got a big hot chocolate with whipped cream and couple of big slices of zucchini bread while i introduced myself to a couple of the rando guys, who were pretty focused on the ride ahead . Joe, the guy leading the ride was really excited to see me. Joe mostly knows me from my writing on Kent's blog and he likes me a lot. He suggested that i join the club on the spot (not likely!).

Many of the randonneurs were wearing wool jerseys, but most were dressed, partially, or entirely, in bike lycra. The staff at the coffee shop complimented me on my outfit, a dapper, but very functional brown wool button up shirt and my grey wool Austrian alpine knickers with black knee socks. Very functional, comfortable outfit!

Just before the 8:30 departure, a guy i know named Mark came in, and he also said, "Wow! I didn't expect to see you here!", but without being dismissive. He was glad i was along.

Joe stood up and made a few announcements. A bit about how he was feeling slow, the typical sandbagging that all randonneurs do all the time. Then he mentioned that this was a stay together ride and they were planning a 12 hour 200k. As we mounted our bicycles, several riders admired my bike and complimented me on the Christmas lights on my bike. I was near the front of the group as we left the parking lot.

They dropped me in less than five minutes.

They set out at a sizzling pace, far above my comfort zone. I started near the front of the group of 18 and i was off the back of the pack in about 6 blocks. And then i struggled for about 20 minutes to keep up as i saw them disappear into the distance. That struggle is what really put me behind, i should have dropped to my own pace immediately.

I never saw a single one of them again. I struggled to chase for a while, but finally gave up and stopped to rest for 10 minutes, catch my breath. I accepted that i was going to ride alone. I didn't like it, but i accepted it. I was frustrated and i was trying to deal with that, i was worried about riding alone, but i was also enjoying being on the bike, enjoying the night and a bit surprisingly, not panicking. I was pretty relaxed, a bit depressed, but relaxed.

Rando rides are not group rides. I know that and they know that. They knew i was self sufficient. It was their ride, i can't dictate the rules, and i know they ride fast. But i was frustrated. I wanted to ride overnight with someone. And i wouldn't have left home if i knew i was going to ride alone, i don't do alone very well. But it also meant that i actually did get out there and ride. I suppose turning around was an option, but it did not occur to me.

As the area changed from suburbia to countryside, there wasn't much car traffic, i had one car pass me too close on the screaming descent off of Redmond Ridge right as i got to the Snoqualmie Valley Road, but otherwise i really only saw a car every 5 or 10 minutes.

It was very pleasant riding. Beautiful to be out at night. The valley was cloudy and calm and quiet. I was calm and collected -- not what is normal for me when alone. I kind of thought i would have panicked, but i didn't. I knew where i was. I have ridden in that valley about a dozen times in the last 20 years. I don't know the road names but i knew i could get myself through even if i didn't follow the course guide (which i mostly didn't).

I did pick a road at least once where i thought i might be able to see a row of 17 bike lights across the valley -- i thought that would look cool, but i didn't see them.

The weather was bit strange. In the days leading up to the solstice, the weather forecast for Tuesday night kept changing from rain to clear, but settled on cloudy and dry. Then just an hour before i left they changed the forecast to rain. I prepared for rain, and cold.

Because of the close proximity of Puget Sound and the Cascade Mountains and all the hills and lakes, we have both variable weather and weather that can be very different in two places only 3 mi apart. I think i experienced some of those micro-climates last night.

It kept threatening to rain, but never did. Twice i rode into areas where it appeared it had just stopped raining, but i never actually got rained on. In fact, it was uncomfortably warm, about 50F most of the night. I was dressed for 35F, so i was very warm... too warm at times. I was carrying several extra layers which i never wore. There were several people at the start who had tried the same ride last Saturday night and turned back due to the amount of they found ice on some of the roads near Carnation. There was nothing like that last night.

There was heavy cloud cover all night, but the full moon behind it made the clouds bright. And i don't think the clouds were that extensive, at times i could see the silhouette of the nearby mountains -- at NIGHT!! I'm guessing that means the clouds did not extend to the high mountains, in any case, it was really really beautiful.

The terrain is interesting. I live on a glacially carved hill, that drops steeply into the Sound on the west and 23 mi long Lake Washington on the east. I rode north around the lake, and the weather changed, then crossed the valley to another lake, and the weather changed, then over a large ridge line to another valley, and the weather changed, and up that valley to where 2 valleys meet, and there was different weather each way!

The valley is all farms, very occasional houses (most with Christmas lights) and steep hills on either side of the valley. It was very pretty. There were a couple of very nice lighting displays out there in the country, one isolated house had big bunches of soft blue lights along the eves that i really liked. There were also the a few very gaudy over-lit houses. But most of the riding was dark farmland. It was silent. Just the gentle hum of my tires.

I got buzzed by an Owl!

I was riding slowly up to a stop sign in the dark with farm fields on either side of me when i caught movement in my peripheral vision. I looked to my right and a giant bird, wings fully outstretched was right there, the dark silhouette of an owl's head against the bright clouds was clear. It pulled up and landed in a tree about 12 feet to my left and 3 or 4 feet above me with that housecat-like air of: 'I meant to do that!"

I'm not sure if it was just heading for the tree when i came by or, more likely, it saw movement and shot towards it before suddenly thinking: 'YOW, that's WAY too big for me to fly away with!' and detouring to the tree. It was cool.

I pedaled through the valley in the silent darkness for a couple of hours. I rode up the valley, and then across the valley on extremely lightly traveled roads. Now it was going to change, i was going to be riding on a two lane highway that connects all the towns in the valley. It has a 55 mph speed limit, and even at 11:30pm it was pretty well traveled.

I know there is a crushed gravel bike trail that parallels the highway -- that's the way i usually ride that area, so i started looking for it. Although it might be weird in the dark, it would be nicer riding and i thought it might be a good test for later in the evening when there was a forest trail option. I took some side roads a couple of times, but i didn't find it, as it was already on the other side of the highway.

Once i got to the very small town of Carnation (originally called Tolt, by both the natives and the European settlers, but later changed to the name of the milk manufacturer when it built a factory, now closed, in town), i stopped at a grocery store and got a strawberry juice.

Riding alone, like doing anything alone, isn't really much fun. Part of that is just me, i'm not good at being alone and i don't enjoy it, but being alone also has several other effects. It affects motivation strongly of course: i find it very hard to motivate myself alone, and quite easy to do so with other people. But more seriously, being alone also affects decision making, fewer brains means fewer ideas and fewer perspectives, less data and less motivation. It's easier to miss something, harder to stop a bad decision.

There were two other concerns that i had while i stood drinking my overly sweet juice. One was food. If i was going to continue i needed a significant meal, and i might have already pushed it too far by not doing that in Redmond. I wasn't going to see any good 24 hour food options for about 40 km -- there is a huge 24 hour grocery in North Bend, and another in Issaquah.

The other was the traffic. Riding at night in a group of 18 riders, well lit, reflective, is one thing. But just one bike is quite another. I was comfortable on the empty, open farm roads, but the highway was a different story.

About 10 km up the road from Carnation is the even smaller town of Fall City. It stands at a point where the wide, flat Snoqualmie valley splits into two very tight, steep valleys. The SIR course goes up the eastern valley, does a 20 mile loop through North Bend, returns to Fall City, then goes up the western valley towards Issaquah. I had already decided to cut off the North Bend loop. A fun loop to do -- i wasn't interested in doing it alone. (But i might encounter the SIR riders in Fall City after they finished the loop!)

That left me a big decision ahead when i got to Fall City: what route to take to Issaquah. All of the options were poor ones. I could ride the course out Issaquah-Fall City road -- a narrow valley that i wasn't familiar with but i believed to be a highway like the one i was on. Not fun. (I've since discovered that it is not a highway.) There is a gravel trail through the forest which i am familiar with but didn't want to ride alone at night. Spooky. (Not to mention the potential to encounter wildlife!) And then the freeway, which i have ridden a couple of times, but wasn't about to try at night. Again, if i wasn't alone, the decision making process would've been very different.

I chose none of them. I called Nadine. It was midnight; i knew if i waited longer to call her, she would be asleep, and i didn't want to wake her up, even though she insisted that was ok. It turned out that she was on her way home from her sister's house and was already fairly close by.

I told her to meet me in Fall City. I saddled up and headed up the valley on the highway. The traffic on that section to Fall City was frustrating, seeming to validate my decision in a way. She picked me up when i had ridden just over 50 miles for the evening.

When we got to her house south of Issaquah, she gave me a big bowl of potato soup and i went to bed. It was hard to get to sleep, i had prepared myself mentally and physically to be up all night… but eventually i did sleep, although fitfully. I was a little disappointed that i didn't stay up all night on the longest night. In the morning Nadine made me an omelet and i set out on my way.

It was sunny and not very cold, the opposite of what the forecast had predicted. There was a road near her house that i had not ridden in over 15 years that i wanted to see, so i rode bits of the course, but took some major detours before rejoining the course in Renton.

I crossed paths that morning with three people i knew, and was able to invite one of them on a ride i was leading later in the week! I rode strong and enjoyed the ride, especially along the lake going north back into Seattle. All of it was on familiar roads. Just a couple of miles from home i stopped at a bakery for a sandwich and juice and then made sure to ride on to E Galer St & 26th Ave E, ritually completing the course, before heading up the hill home. I realized why i don't usually go that way, the hill on Galer is VERY steep! I had to walk most of a block.

It was a fun ride, despite my frustration at riding alone. If i wasn't alone i almost surely would've ridden to Issaquah and would've completed the 100 mile loop and probably the 126 mile (200 km) course overnight. But it turned out well, and i rode 91 miles (145km). I honestly felt like it was success.

One of the reasons that randonneurs give for doing the rides that they do, one of the excuses, is to test out skills and equipment. My equipment performed flawlessly. The repair i made to the generator worked very well. My wheels are on their last legs (so to speak!), i knew that. They need to be replaced soon. And my gloves weren't great. Not terrible, but not satisfactory; i was testing out a new pair of gloves, i still can't find a really workable pair like the old REI gloves i had for so many years.

I was pleased that everything worked quite well. And my skills were also quite up to the task. So both get an A. I did well, rode strong, made good, safe decisions. Handled the bike well, handled the dark well, enjoyed the road, experienced the night. I was pleased.

The ride was enjoyable. It was interesting, it was weird, it was frustrating, it was a learning experience. Over all it was good.

12 December 2010

I'm Proud of The BBC

Recently, the crazy right-wing nut who leads the British coalition Government has suggested abolishing the British Broadcasting Corporation. As hard as that is to actually imagine, there really is a discussion going on right now about it.

I find this bizarre and incomprehensible. The scope and the quality of the BBC (even outside of Britain) is simply amazing. Without the BBC most Americans wouldn't even think of the UK, and we surely wouldn't know anything about it. Instead we feel we know it well. There may not be much else that Americans like about British culture, but the BBC has made us all Anglophiles.

The impact of the BBC worldwide is difficult to exaggerate. I don't think it's too much of a stretch to say that it is the most respected, successful, even beloved aspect of British culture, full stop. It's certainly safe to say that the BBC is the most respected media organization in the world. BBC news is where the world turns for a big story. Internationally it has a reputation as simply the best, the gold standard. People in the US love the BBC's informative and educational shows so much that the mark of excellence for a US made show is to compare it to the BBC.

And the BBC entertainment division is legendary -- certainly the world leader in radio drama and the most fertile development ground for TV comedies. The astonishingly well made dramas set the bar for producers over here. Perhaps surprisingly to Americans, an awfully lot of the most successful sitcoms in the US were actually remakes of BBC shows. They originated at the creative headquarters, the BBC.

The BBC's impact on popular music, especially the rock music of the sixties can't be overstated, music as we know it would not exist without the BBC. John Peel supported every new type of music for 30 years and was especially important in the development of Punk and New Wave.

Inside of the UK the BBC is even more important, loved, needed and valuable -- it is the glue that holds the country together.

And perhaps best of all for every one of us who watches or listens, there are NO ADVERTISEMENTS! The BBC is funded by an annual per-set charge on TV & radios within the country. A non-profit, user funded, broadcasting system is, by it's very nature, focused on quality instead of advertising. The BBC is the poster child for this idea. There is simply more substance and better quality. Both radio and TV programs are far more educational, more entertaining, more well made than at a private for profit broadcaster because their goal, and even reason for existing, is to entertain and educate, not to score ratings points by appealing the lowest common denominator while spending as little as possible in order to enrich the owners.

Consequently the BBC has given a platform for talented people who cared about what they were doing to do amazing things -- people we wouldn't know about otherwise. In short the BBC has showed the world how it should be done.

The BBC has made me wish i was British for most of my life and i know hundreds of other people who feel the same way. The BBC has shown the rest of the world how to make radio, how to make TV, how to report the news.

Mitch Benn is a British comedian and songwriter. He's a favorite of mine. He writes topical parody songs many which he performs on the absolutely wonderful Now Show on BBC Radio 4.

Last month Mitch Benn wrote a magnificent song about this insane idea of abolishing the best thing the British have ever done. It's a catchy tune and it's fun to pick out the familiar shows -- although he can only include a small sample. It's obviously a funny parody. It's full of fascinating and sometimes gymnastic rhymes and it also is a powerful political statement that is deeply moving. I bet you can't listen to it only once.

After listening to it repeatedly, i decided to create a list of all the shows and personalities he mentions. The impact of the BBC is evident in the fact that i was already familiar with a huge number of these. A few are very key parts of our culture, even here, 5,000 kilomenters away; others are shows i love and listen to on BBC 4 and BBC 7 on the internet (i'm an addict!). And i was amazed at how many of the TV shows were either remade in the US or inspired US spinoffs, movies, and much more. No other organization, public or private can claim even a fraction of the cultural impact of the BBC. And that's in the US, across the ocean, where they theoretically don't have any presence!!

Below i discuss some of the shows that had an impact in the US, but first, here's the video of I'm Proud of The BBC. Enjoy!

And here are the words as i transcribed them:
            

Newsround
Newsnight
iPlayer
website
Toni Arthur
Brian Cant
Spooks
and Adam Adamant
Postman Pat
Blackadder
Hancock
and Yes Minister
Later With Jools Holland
Pride
And Prejudice
Hitchhikers Guide
world service
Stewart Lee
Mr. Benn
Casualty
6 music
Glastonbury
Horrible Histories
Dennis Potter
Cbeebies
Quatermass
and Two Ronnies
The Thick Of It
radio 3
Open University
Kermode & Mayo
Round The Horne
The Goon Show
Blake's 7
Dick & Dom
Last Night Of The Proms
Gardeners' Question Time
Last Of The Summer Wine
Steptoe & Son
Clangers
and The Young Ones
Edge Of Darkness
Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
Letter From America
The Mighty Boosh
and QI
Panorama
and Bagpuss
I Claudius
Absolutely Fabulous

i'm proud of the BBC
it's part of you
and it's part of me
it's just this and lousy weather
that holds us together
i'm proud of the BBC
it's not too slick
but it was never supposed to be
it's comfort and inspiration
for the nation


John Mosston
Red Dwarf
Our Friends In The North
Culture Show
Woman's Hour
Charlie and Lola
Alan Partridge
Sherlock
News at 6 O'clock
Live Aid
Likely Lads
Michael Palin
NO ADS
This Life
That's Life
Life on Earth
The Good Life
Captain Pugwash
Tony Hart
Till Death Do Us Part
Ken Bruce
News Quiz
Keeping Up Appearances
Outnumbered
Miranda
Who Do You Think You Are?
Kirsty Wark
Paxman
Parkinson
and Wogan
Tripods
Fireman Sam
The Ascent Of Man
One Foot In The Grave
Ben & Xander
Rob & Dave
Antiques Roadshow
David Attenborough
Bruce Forsyth
with The League Of Gentlemen
Hairy Bikers
Being Human
In The Night Garden
Have I Got News For You
You & Me (Me & You)
Monty Python
Doctor Who!!!!!

i'm proud of the BBC
it's part of you
and it's part of me
we're not just listeners and viewers
it belongs to us
i'm proud of the BBC
and at least it doesn't pretend to be free
and it's to nothing to what we'll pay
if it goes away


Top Gear
Merlin
Ivor The Engine
Watchdog
Wimbledon
Springwatch
Formula 1
Blue Peter
Swap Shop
5 live
Top Of The Pops
Trumpton
and The Archers
That Was The Week That Was
Goodies
and Songs Of Praise
World At One
The Day Today
Sorry I Haven't A Clue
Not The Nine O'clock News
Nationwide
Mr. Men
Doctor Who again
EastEnders
Bottom
Gary Lineker
radio 1
radio 2
did i mention Doctor Who?
Ripping Yarns
Johnny Ball
Test Match Special
Bergerac
Perfect Day
Radio Active
Howard's Way
Jeremy Hardy
Final Score
everything on BBC 4
Only Fools
Sky At Night
and Shooting Stars
Pete & Dud
Teletubbies
and Life on Mars
Radcliffe and Maconie
Jackanory
A Bit of Fry and Laurie
Children In Need Appeal
Douglas Adams
John Peel!!!!

i'm proud of the BBC
like everybody has the right to be
it's British as mid-summer showers
and it's ours
i'm proud of the BBC
if we let it go, then it's gone perpetually
and even if you don't always choose it
you'll know what you had if you loose it
it wouldn't be the same without it
no doubt about it


i see The Wombles
i see The Office
i see Nigella on the BBC
i see Rolf Harris
i see Sue Barker
and Bob the Builder on the BBC
i hear The Now Show
and Brian Matthew
Steve Lamacq on the BBC
i see Gavin
i see Stacey
Eric & Ernie on the BBC
i hear Bob Harris
and Ask Elvis
and Just A Minute on the BBC
i see Doctors
and Faulty Towers
Gordon the Gopher on the BBC
i see Z-cars
i see Grange Hill
and Graham Norton on the BBC
i see Mary
i see Mungo
i see Midge on the BBC


To expand on just a few of those:
  • Spooks was remade in the USA as MI-5,
  • Blackadder is a cult hit in the US,
  • The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy is legendary of course,
  • Yes Minister and Pride And Prejudice are PBS staples.
  • the BBC world service is widely considered the best news source anywhere.
  • The Goon Show basically invented modern comedy, Monty Python developed from it.
  • Steptoe & Son became Sanford and Son in the US.
  • The Young Ones defined classic comedy for my generation.
  • Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Letter From America are PBS staples.
  • Absolutely Fabulous was huge here too.
  • Red Dwarf is a cult classic and PBS staple.
  • Sherlock is becoming quite popular in the US.
  • Live Aid is a defining moment in pop history.
  • The Good Life, remade as Good Neighbors in the US.
  • Till Death Do Us Part became All In the Family which was hugely popular, spawned half a dozen spin offs and pretty much defined TV comedy for the next 25 years in the US. Yes, it came from the BBC.
  • News Quiz inspired Wait Wait Don't Tell Me. I listen to News Quiz every week.
  • Who Do You Think You Are? is a Family History program remade in the US
  • The Ascent Of Man The definition of the informative, interesting show. We have ENTIRE CHANNELS (Discovery) that are based on this series and similar BBC shows.
  • One Foot In The Grave remade as Cosby in the US.
  • Antiques Roadshow - the US remake is a part of our culture.
  • Monty Python one of the most defining parts of our culture.
  • Doctor Who in the 70s & 80s this was a cult classic in the US, and a PBS staple.
  • Merlin is shown here.
  • Top Of The Pops helped to define the 1960s music scene on both sides of the Atlantic.
  • That Was The Week That Was was remade in the US.
  • I'm Sorry I Haven't A Clue is a wonderful, funny, radio panel game that inspired several NPR shows such as Says You. I listen to it weekly.
  • Not The Nine O'clock News was remade in the US.
  • Doctor Who again -- The modern Doctor Who is very popular here.
  • Jeremy Hardy is one of my favorite comedians
  • Pete & Dud gave us movie star Dudley Moore.
  • Teletubbies was broadcast here and very well known.
  • Life on Mars was remade in the US.
  • A Bit of Fry and Laurie Stephen Fry is popular in the US and Hugh Laurie now stars in a popular US TV show.
  • Douglas Adams is one of the greats, we'd be poorer without him.
  • John Peel was one of the most important people in music history. Without him, rock, punk and most all popular music wouldn't be the same.
  • The Office the US remake was a #1 show.
  • Rolf Harris comedy songwriter
  • Bob the Builder -- anyone with kids knows this!
  • The Now Show a British news satire show, one of my favorite weekly half hours
  • Ask Elvis -- This is Mitch Benn himself!
  • Just A Minute a Great panel game that i listen to weekly on BBC 4
  • Faulty Towers a PBS staple.

10 October 2010

42

Today is 42! Yesterday was 38!

Today is one of 36 dates in the last 11 years that can be confused with a binary number and converted into decimal. Today is 42 in both American and European style dates.

That is, the date, as we usually express it in the US, can be read as if it were a binary number, rather than a date. This is not a conversion, we have to mis-read it as binary.

Most dates cannot be read in binary because they contain digits other than 0 and 1. My birthday,  11/18/63 could not be. It's got all those 8s & 3s and 6s which have no meaning in binary. Binary, base 2, has only two digits available, 0 and 1.  Another system, decimal, base 10, which we are more familiar with which has 10 digits available, zero through nine. (Actually the "di" in digit refers to base 10 (decimal) so that is not an accurate term to use with binary, but it helps to explain it. The correct word for binary digits, is BITS.)

First lets take apart a decimal number for an example: 7703. We know instinctively how big that number is: about eight thousand, or more specifically, it is almost eight times ten times ten times ten. In decimal, when we run out of digits, we increment the next column. When we have counted to 10 by ones, we increment the 10s column to indicate one ten, and we start over at zero with the ones. When we run out of 10s we increment the 100s and then the 1000s. So when we read it, or rather when we do math with it, we are actually reading this:
3 ones
0 tens
7 hundreds (10 to the 2nd, or 10 x 10)
7 thousands (10 to the 3rd, or 10 x 10 x 10)

We add that all up to get the total value represented by that number.

Now let's take today's date apart. In the US we express the date as month-day-year, which for today, Sunday October 10, 2010, we get 10/10/10. If we drop the dividers, that's 101010. It's not actually a binary number, but it looks like one. It's not a decimal number either, it's a combination of bases, but if we were to take it and read it in decimal it would translate like this:

0 one (10 to the 0th, or 1 x 1)
1 ten (10 to the 1st, or 10 x 1)
0 hundreds (10 to the 2nd, or 10 x 10)
1 thousand (10 to the 3rd, or 10 x 10 x 10)
0 ten thousand (10 to the 4th, or 10 x 10 x 10 x 10)
1 hundred thousands (10 to the 5th, or 10 x 10 x 10 x 10 x 10)

0+10+0+1000+0+100,000 = one hundred one thousand and ten.

We do that instinctively with decimal.  We can do the same thing in binary, but we don't have ten digits to play with, only two!  So 101010 is

0 one (2 to the 0th, or 1 x 1)
1 two (2 to the 1st, or 2 x 1)
0 fours (2 to the 2nd, or 2 x 2
1 eight (2 to the 3rd, or 2 x 2 x 2)
0 sixteen (2 to the 4th, or 2 x 2 x 2 x 2)
1 thirty-twos (2 to the 5th, or 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2)

0+2+0+8+0+32 = 10+32 = 42

The powers of two have become more familiar to us recently because computers use them, so the sequence of values: 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024..... up to 65536 are numbers that appear frequently in computer related topics.

If we render the date in the European style dd mm yy rather than mm dd yy we would get the same thing today, but something different most days.

The first date that works this was was Jan 1, 2000, it converts to 20 (5 in Europe). The last date that will work is Nov 11, 2011 which converts to 63 in both Europe and the USA.

It is of course arbitrary to choose one base or another. It's just fun because it LOOKS like a binary number, which that doesn't happen often and it converts into a fairly small (two digit) decimal number. We had a few days in January, October & November 2000, 2001 and 2010 that worked, and a few more in 2011, then no more for 89 years.

We could, of course read today's date 101010 in an infinite number of other bases.

In trinary (base 3), 101010 is 0+3+0+27+0+243 = 273 decimal.
or in octal (base 8) it's 33,288 decimal
or duodecimal (base 12) it's 250,572 decimal
or hexadecimal (base 16) it's1,052,688  decimal
or in base 72 it's 1,935,290,952 decimal
and in base 296 it's 2,272,288,717,608 decimal!


Here's the list of all the dates and the result when we mis-read it as binary.


date US style binary date Euro style binary
01/01/2000 20
01.01.2000 5
01/10/2000 24
10.01.2000 6
01/11/2000 28
11.01.2000 7
10/01/2000 36
01.10.2000 9
10/10/2000 40
10.10.2000 10
10/11/2000 44
11.10.2000 11
11/01/2000 52
01.11.2000 13
11/10/2000 56
10.11.2000 14
11/11/2000 60
11.11.2000 15
01/01/2001 21
01.01.2001 21
01/10/2001 25
10.01.2001 22
01/11/2001 29
11.01.2001 23
10/01/2001 37
01.10.2001 25
10/10/2001 41
10.10.2001 26
10/11/2001 45
11.10.2001 27
11/01/2001 53
01.11.2001 29
11/10/2001 57
10.11.2001 30
11/11/2001 61
11.11.2001 31
01/01/2010 22
01.01.2010 37
01/10/2010 26
10.01.2010 38
01/11/2010 30
11.01.2010 39
10/01/2010 38
01.10.2010 41
10/10/2010 42
10.10.2010 42
10/11/2010 46
11.10.2010 43
11/01/2010 54
01.11.2010 45
11/10/2010 58
10.11.2010 46
11/11/2010 62
11.11.2010 47
01/01/2011 23
01.01.2011 53
01/10/2011 27
10.01.2011 54
01/11/2011 31
11.01.2011 55
10/01/2011 39
01.10.2011 57
10/10/2011 43
10.10.2011 58
10/11/2011 47
11.10.2011 59
11/01/2011 55
01.11.2011 61
11/10/2011 59
10.11.2011 62
11/11/2011 63
11.11.2011 63

13 September 2010

How Many Monkeys

Every week at the Thursday Night Volunteer Repair Parties at Bike Works, we put down the tools for a few minutes to introduce ourselves and chat a little. There is always a question for each person to answer to help get to know people, to get us talking. Usually it's a bicycling question, but not always. Sometimes it's very serious, other times funny, often it's about a favorite food or favorite ride.

A couple of weeks ago a volunteer named John asked the group this question:
How many monkeys do you think there are in the world?

It was a fun question.

There were guesses as high as 3 billion and as low as 100,000. Most people guessed between 5 and 80 million. I guessed "under one million". But here's the thing: John doesn't know the real answer, he just uses it as an ice breaker.

 Well, this data geek couldn't let that THAT go... so when i got home i started searching and creating a data model. I surveyed the primate fact sheets at animal info.org and the Univ of Wisc Primate Info Net. I included some mathematically modeled estimates since some species don't have detailed population numbers on the factsheets, but the numbers seem pretty solid.

There are three genii of primates: Lemurs, Monkeys (distinguished by having a tail) and Apes (distinguished by not having a tail). I have removed one of the species of ape from the totals, and have listed it as separate category: Homo sapiens.

There are 67 species of monkey. I found primate fact sheets on 24 of those species (18 of which are endangered).  There are currently 826,166 individuals among those 24 species. Mathematically modeling (using the median), for the species missing fact sheets, gives an estimated total of about 950,000 monkeys in the world.

There are 15 species of ape (excluding humans). I found primate fact sheets on 10 of those species (9 of which are endangered). There are currently 691,525 individuals among those 10 species. Mathematically modeling (using the median), for the species missing fact sheets, gives an estimated total of about 810,000 apes in the world.

There are 24 species of lemur. I found primate fact sheets on 4 of those species (almost all of the 24 are critically endangered). Among those 4 species there are currently 51,180 individuals. Mathematically modeling (using the median) for the species missing fact sheets gives an estimated total of about 100,000 lemurs in the world.

There are roughly 7,100,000,000 humans in the world.

So i found that there are several answers to John's question. How Many monkeys are there in the world?
  • 950,000 - if we use only the genus Monkey.
  • 1,750,000 - using the standard colloquial definition, (monkeys and non-human apes).
  • including Lemurs, there are just under 2 million non-human primates in the world.
It's very disturbing to me that on this planet for every monkey there are about 3,800 human beings!!!



distinction

species w #

species

actual count

est total (using median)
monkeys
have tail

24

67

826,166

950,000

apes

no tail

10

14

691,525

810,000

total


34

81

1,517,691

1,760,000



lemurs

3rd family

4

24

51,180

100,000

humans

apes



7,100,000,000

7,100,000,000

19 June 2010

A Hard year on The Divide

(originally published on Kent's Bike Blog in June 2010.
While Kent was away racing the Great Divide Mountain Bike Race, i was substitute blogger.)


The most important thing anyone has ever told me is what my camp director Tay Gillespie repeated constantly when i was a kid: "Happiness is a path, not a destination." As i've rolled through life since then i've discovered frequently that she was correct. I can't seem to always live by those words, but i've never heard better advice.

This is a very challenging year on the Divide, due mostly to lots and lots of mud, but also to cold. I spoke to Kent yesterday and he said that he's in as good or better riding shape than 5 years ago. But the trail is in worse shape.

The snow and mud not only slow riders down, often to the 24 inch gear (2 feet, aka walking), but the deepest mud can strip off derailleurs, break chains, snap spokes, trash brakes, and just generally clog the bike to the point of making it luggage, a load to be carried rather than the most elegant transportation.

It took Kent 4 days to cover what took 3 days in 2005. Most of the other veterans are experiencing a similarly longer ride, and most of the Rookies are staggered and amazed.

An awfully lot of them, including some still riding, were not NEARLY as well prepared for this race as Kent was. Over a dozen racers have dropped out, so far. (More than 1/4 of the starting contingent.) Many dropped out because of the physical challenge - it's a REALLY hard race; some have had equipment failures. But for most, it was mental. The goal paled against the challenge of the road.

Kent stressed that he's having a great time -- just talking to him made me wish i was there riding with him. He's riding, and walking, hard. He is motivated by the finish line, but he's enjoying his trip through the mountains. He's gaining strength from the fantastic scenery.

About the fast guys way out front, he said, and i will quote in full: "holy cow".

This is a race, have no doubt, and Kent is pushing himself hard. He's got goals and dreams of the finish. But the Mountain Turtle knows, and constantly remembers my camp director's mantra. It's about the road. Who knows what the destination will be.

Kent is enjoying the road. Every time i have ridden with Kent over the years, he has embodied this philosophy (although he's never stated it in those words). That's the key that makes it so much fun to ride with him. He enjoys the ride, the road, the path. And that's why he's such a good Divide racer.

Hasten Slowly Mountain Turtle!

Mark

26 April 2010

tidal cycles - waves around the world

I made these pretty charts and learned something about the tides from them. I really like them, they seem like art to me, and i didn't really know what to do with them, so i figured i'd post them here.

This started initially with an observation that the summer highest tides seemed to be always right around lunchtime, while the winter highest tides were around midnight.

Here in Seattle we have a 16 foot daily tidal range -- large enough to be very noticeable. We are on a fjord called The Salish Sea or Puget Sound; it is teaming with life: at low tide it is fascinating to wander the intertidal zone and see the crabs, mollusks, fish, plants and even octopi that live at the edge of the underwater world. A biologist friend and i often gave guided tide tours to travelers at the lowest tides, so i was alert to what time these tides happen.

The extremes happen during the 2 or 3 full or new moons closest to the solstice. That means that once in May, once in June and once in July. And also once in November, once in December and once in January.

The lowest and highest tides happen on the same day! It's pretty amazing to walk a couple hundred meters from 'shore' on the sand and rocks, knowing that in just 6 hours the water will be three times my height deep where i am! The entire fjord fills up really fast. That's a lot of water.

I tend to think of the highest high tides being in the winter and the lowest low tides being in the summer, but that may have more to do with what i see in daylight. And THAT gets me to the question i had...

Tides vary significantly from tide height to tide height and from day to day, month to month. A detailed tide table, made using very complex math, is required to predict a tide for any day.

There are four tides a day, a high high and a lower high, a low low and a higher low, although because the cycle is not exactly timed to 24 hours (i think it's 28 hours) every few days one tide is missed. The tide tables are sine waves, showing the tide rising a falling.


Every year when we would plan our low tide walks, we would consult the tide tables to find out at what time the lowest tides each month would be. And after about 10 years i noticed that those super low tides in May, June & July were always right around mid-day.

So i wondered, is that a rule of the system? Is it just a coincidence of Seattle's location (47 degrees latitude), of era (1990s & 2000s), or is there something that governed that.

Tides are caused by a gravity interplay of the three body system of the sun, the moon and the earth. They effect our bodies and the rocks and mountains, but in such tiny amounts that it is not noticeable. However water is both fluid and heavy and there's a lot of it. The moon's pull, the sun's pull and the force of the earth swinging around the sun sloshes the oceans around, keeping big bumps of water underneath the moon and the sun, and opposite the sun (from the swing).

Tide is also effected by latitude (because the earth is tilted, tides are smaller near the equator) and by the depth and shape of various inlets.

I have several good tide prediction websites that i regularly use, notablyNOAA and the WWW Tide Predictor at the University of South Carolina. I

Initially i got data from both places, but i wanted to be consistent and i really like the US National Oceanic an Atmospheric Administration, so i used only data from there. I picked 28 sites around the world. I tried to get a good spread, but i can't say this is random in any way; i leaned towards places i had visited or knew of and i only picked 28 data points.

I used the tides data for two years, from both 2010 and 2011 superimposed on each other to get  fuller and more consistent data.  That's a couple thousand tides (about 4 per day 730 days) for each site!   I graphed only the most extreme tides, and color coded them according to season.

The graphs helped me to answer my question.  This phenomenon is pretty much world wide, it's not unique to Seattle.  The highest highs in the winter and summer are about 12 hours apart, and the lowest lows the same.  Some places it's not noon and midnight, but the pattern is the same. (Studying the physics of tidal motion further i was able to determine those super low tides in the summer will in fact always be around mid-day, and the super-highs in the winter around mid-day.)

I was finished with the graphs, but i found that the images were so beautiful i wanted to keep them.

Here they are, arranged from south to north, regardless of longitude. I hid the spring and fall and only plotted the summer (pink) and winter (blue) tides. You'll notice a solid line through each graph, that's the mean low tide line, or zero. The scale changes, often enormously, from graph to graph. I am not trying to compare the amplitude of tides from place to place, only the patterns, so i chose a different  scale for each graph so they are all comparable in size.


Davis, Antarctica


Ushuaia, Argentina


Lady Barron Harbour, Tasmania, Australia


Omaio Bay, Motunui Island, New Zealand


Sydney, Australia


Durban, South Africa


Fortaleza, Brazil


Port Royal, Isla Roatan, Honduras


Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico


Hilo Bay, Hilo, Hawaii


Isigaki, Okinawa


Key West, Florida


Bay St. Louis, Mississippi


Charlston, South Carolina


Inner Harbor, Long Beach, California


Coney Island, New York, New York


Tokati, Hokkaido, Japan


Casco Bay, Portland, Maine


Skipanon River, Warrenton, Oregon


St. Johns, Newfoundland, Canada


Seattle, Washington


Dover, England


Llandudno, Gwynedd, Wales


West-Terschelling, Netherlands


Zehnerloch, Germany


Wick, Scotland


Leaf Bay, Ungava, Bay, Quebec


Knik Arm, Cook Inlet, Anchorage, Alaska

16 March 2010

Perfectionism and the "Good Enough" gauge

The problem with perfectionism is NOT the inability to be satisfied -- although that can be frustrating.

The problem with perfectionism is NOT the unwillingness to start things because you could never do it well enough -- although that's terribly deblitating.

The problem with perfectionism is NOT the cutting yourself off from everyone and everything that is not perfect, since nothing is -- although that is so destructive.

No, the problem with perfectionism is not having the ability to judge good enough.

We all have an inbuilt gauge of what is good enough. Call it the sufficient gland, or the appropriate gauge, the satisfactory meter, or the acceptable index or whatever. Is 75% good enough, 65%? 90%, 10%?

Many people have a fairly well calibrated acceptable index. The rest of us envy them. Some peoples' gauges, are clearly set far too low, and we are all annoyed with those people. And other peoples' are set annoyingly high.

But with perfectionists, the gauge is pegged at the top, full-on all the time. There is no variation, it never reads anything different so it is USELESS, leaving that person with NO GAUGE of 'good enough' AT ALL.

You either stupidly stare at the gauge, and everything will always fall below the topped out meter, so nothing is ever good enough, or, with awareness of the malfunction, you ignore the gauge and have to GUESS what is satisfactory with no guide or ruler at all. It makes it really, really, REALLY hard to judge anything in any part of your day, in any part of your life.

How many flaws can i allow in someone i'm dating? Is alcoholism too much? My 'good enough' gauge is pegged so i'm in the dark. When can i stop working so people will think i've done enough. How many times do i need to re-edit that piece about perfectionism that i wrote before i can show it to someone. And on and on.

09 February 2010

Insult by Punctuation

Punctuation can entirely change the meaning of a sentence.   We've all seen their (possessive) when the writer meant they are.
 
There is an advertising campaign that's plastered the Seattle area for the last couple of  years, mostly on bus signs, that i find annoying because of bad punctuation.   Actually it's not annoying so much as incomprehensible.  I don't know who the ad it is for, i think it's an insurance company.  It says

                We're a lot like you.
                A Little Different.

The punctuation is completely wrong. They put a period between the two phrases.  Since it's obviously wrong you have to try to figure out what the correct punctuation should be and substitute that, only then can you understand it.  They leave that up to the reader.  Most people do that unconsciously but because i have Aspergers and i'm a bit obsessive, i'm very conscious of it every time i see it.

Honestly, the problem isn't that it's wrong, that's no big deal; the problem is that there are two different possible ways to punctuate it correctly and so there are two very different ways to understand it.  There is no way to know which is the intended one, and they have very significantly different meanings.

One meaning is very insulting, the other invokes a bit of camaraderie.  The first dozen times or so that i saw the advertisement i read it the insulting way.  Even now when i read it, the insulting way seems the more likely based on how it's written.

That period is wrong.

What should it be? It cannot be a period because the second phrase is not a complete sentence; it can't be a semi-colon for the same reason. So the only possibilities are: a comma, or a colon

The more uncommon, academic way of reading it would be with a colon.  I suspect this is the one they intended, even though it's a more rare use, and most people would be less likely to default to that.

     We are a lot like you: a little different.

Which means --  We are all in the same boat, and together we're special, not quite like those other people.


The more common, more readily understandable way to read it would be with the comma.   It would say:

       We are a lot like you, a little different.

Which means -- "Well, we may be a bit odd, but not as weird as you are! We're not that strange!!"

Every time i see it i think they are telling me (and everyone around me) that we're too weird for them.